Platform maintenance (MRO) work order preparation
The fault report is matched to technical publications, task card and parts list are produced, the work order opens with planner approval.
Platform maintenance (MRO) work order preparation is an agent scenario in the Defence & Aerospace sector running on the app, api, batch channels. Trigger: Post-flight fault entry or a scheduled-maintenance trigger from the MMS. The Maintenance Supervisor coordinates 4 specialist agents (Fault Agent, Tech Pub Agent, Parts Agent, Planning Agent) across 4 systems (Maintenance Management System, Technical Publications (S1000D vector), Spares Inventory, Technician App); of 9 steps, 1 write to systems and 2 are checks or approvals. Outcome: Work order opened with the right task cards and reserved parts; assigned to the technician crew. Approval rule: Every work package affecting airworthiness → maintenance planner approval.
Platform maintenance (MRO) work order preparation
- Fault entry F-30917: tail number 07, “hydraulic pressure warning, system 2”
- Component history pulled: pump P2 had 2 similar warnings in the last 400 hours
- Fault class: hydraulic pump degradation; likely cause internal leakage; airworthiness priority
- Task cards found: 29-11-05 pump test, 29-11-07 replacement; revision current
- IPC parts list: pump P/N 4211-88, 2 seals; stock has 1 pump, 6 seals
- Tool list and calibration dates valid; estimated 6.5 man-hours
- Airworthiness impact → maintenance planner approved the work package
- Work order WO-71822 opened, parts reserved, crew assigned to shift B
- Task cards, parts list and safety notes pushed to the technician app
- ■completed
Simulation · derived from real agent definitions · every agent can be built by dialogue with the Autonomous Agent and validated with a test corpus
Post-flight fault entry or a scheduled-maintenance trigger from the MMS
Work order opened with the right task cards and reserved parts; assigned to the technician crew
Agents
Maintenance Supervisor
Decomposes the objective, delegates to agents, manages approval points, merges the result.
Fault Agent
Interprets the fault entry and history
get_fault_recordget_component_historyclassify_faultTech Pub Agent
Finds task cards in the maintenance manuals
search_tech_pubsget_task_cardcheck_revisionParts Agent
Checks parts, tooling and stock availability
get_ipc_partscheck_stockreserve_partsPlanning Agent
Opens the work order and assigns the crew
create_work_orderassign_crewnotify_crewSteps
| # | Kind | Agent | What happens | System | ms | tok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | ingest | Maintenance Supervisor | Fault entry F-30917: tail number 07, “hydraulic pressure warning, system 2” | — | 200 | — |
| 02 | tool | Fault Agent | Component history pulled: pump P2 had 2 similar warnings in the last 400 hours | Maintenance Management System | 440 | — |
| 03 | reason | Fault Agent | Fault class: hydraulic pump degradation; likely cause internal leakage; airworthiness priority | — | 780 | 980 |
| 04 | retrieve | Tech Pub Agent | Task cards found: 29-11-05 pump test, 29-11-07 replacement; revision current | Technical Publications (S1000D vector) | 620 | 760 |
| 05 | tool | Parts Agent | IPC parts list: pump P/N 4211-88, 2 seals; stock has 1 pump, 6 seals | Spares Inventory | 420 | — |
| 06 | verify | Parts Agent | Tool list and calibration dates valid; estimated 6.5 man-hours | — | 360 | 240 |
| 07 | approval | Maintenance Supervisor | Airworthiness impact → maintenance planner approved the work package | — | 2,800 | — |
| 08 | write | Planning Agent | Work order WO-71822 opened, parts reserved, crew assigned to shift B | Maintenance Management System | 520 | — |
| 09 | notify | Planning Agent | Task cards, parts list and safety notes pushed to the technician app | Technician App | 260 | — |
Technical publication assistant: maintenance manual, parts, procedure and revision control
The technician asks in the hangar; the right-revision procedure, part number and safety note arrive with clearance checks, every access traced.
Export control and end-user screening
Part, buyer and end use are classified in one flow; licence need is detected, the decision always stays with the compliance officer.
Supplier security and compliance assessment
Supplier questionnaires and documents are read, compared against facility security requirements, gaps listed; the qualification decision belongs to the security manager.
Time to move from experimenting with AI to transforming with it.
In a 30-minute discovery session we take your 2–3 priority business problems, show a live demo of a similar scenario, and draft a roadmap that starts with the Value layer.
- Your 2–3 priority problems
- Live demo of a similar scenario
- Roadmap starting with value analysis