Code review and security gate
Agents review, scan and coverage-check every PR; fixes land first, a human approves only clean PRs.
Code review and security gate
- PR #2318 opened: "Coupon validation service", 9 files, +684 / −120, author M.A.
- Plan: review + security + coverage in parallel → fix → re-check → human approval
- Diff and 4 calling modules read; 3 findings: race condition, null check, N+1 query
- SAST: 1 high (SQL string concatenation, line 212), no secrets found
- Dependencies: newly added jsonwebtoken 8.5.1 → 1 medium CVE, 9.0.2 suggested
- Coverage: new code 64% (threshold 80%), 6 tests missing for CouponRules
- 5 findings fixed, jsonwebtoken 9.0.2, 6 tests added; commit 4e1b9c pushed
- Re-check: SAST 0 high, coverage 86%, 1,312 tests passed → gates green
- Code owner (CODEOWNERS) reviewed PR #2318, left 1 comment, approved
- PR #2318 merged to main, review trail and scan reports attached to the PR
Simulation · derived from real agent definitions · every agent can be built by dialogue with the Autonomous Agent and validated with a test corpus
Pull request opened or updated on GitHub (webhook)
PR findings fixed, security and coverage gates green, ready to merge with human approval
Agents
Review Supervisor
Decomposes the objective, delegates to agents, manages approval points, merges the result.
Reviewer Agent
Reads the diff, writes bug, design and style findings
read_diffsearch_codebasepost_review_commentSecurity Agent
Triages SAST, secret and dependency findings
run_sastscan_secretsscan_dependenciestriage_findingsTester Agent
Measures the coverage delta, proposes missing tests
run_testsreport_coveragesuggest_testsDeveloper Agent
Fixes findings, adds tests, updates the PR
edit_filesrun_testspush_commitSteps
| # | Kind | Agent | What happens | System | ms | tok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | ingest | Review Supervisor | PR #2318 opened: "Coupon validation service", 9 files, +684 / −120, author M.A. | — | 160 | — |
| 02 | plan | Review Supervisor | Plan: review + security + coverage in parallel → fix → re-check → human approval | — | 280 | 210 |
| 03 | reason | Reviewer Agent | Diff and 4 calling modules read; 3 findings: race condition, null check, N+1 query | — | 2,200 | 4,800 |
| 04 | tool | Security Agent | SAST: 1 high (SQL string concatenation, line 212), no secrets found | SonarQube | 1,800 | — |
| 05 | tool | Security Agent | Dependencies: newly added jsonwebtoken 8.5.1 → 1 medium CVE, 9.0.2 suggested | Dependency Scanner (Snyk) | 900 | — |
| 06 | tool | Tester Agent | Coverage: new code 64% (threshold 80%), 6 tests missing for CouponRules | CI Runner (GitHub Actions) | 2,400 | — |
| 07 | write | Developer Agent | 5 findings fixed, jsonwebtoken 9.0.2, 6 tests added; commit 4e1b9c pushed | GitHub | 3,600 | 7,400 |
| 08 | verify | Tester Agent | Re-check: SAST 0 high, coverage 86%, 1,312 tests passed → gates green | — | 2,600 | 500 |
| 09 | approval | Review Supervisor | Code owner (CODEOWNERS) reviewed PR #2318, left 1 comment, approved | — | 4,000 | — |
| 10 | write | Developer Agent | PR #2318 merged to main, review trail and scan reports attached to the PR | GitHub | 420 | — |
Feature delivery pipeline
A Jira epic turns into criteria, design, code and tests via agents; humans only review and approve the PR.
CI/CD release pipeline
Build, tests, scans and staging run unattended; production ships only on release-manager approval, via ArgoCD.
Incident response and hotfix
Alert fires, bug reproduced, patch and regression run ready; on-call approves, post-mortem already drafted.
Time to move from experimenting with AI to transforming with it.
In a 30-minute discovery session we take your 2–3 priority business problems, show a live demo of a similar scenario, and draft a roadmap that starts with the Value layer.
- Your 2–3 priority problems
- Live demo of a similar scenario
- Roadmap starting with value analysis